External factors play a big role too. Hotter climates elevate electron excitement. The marginal benefit of temperature is reached at 25°C (77°F), above which high energy electrons are less effectively separated, lowering efficiency. For every degree above 25°C, a typical solar panel’s conversion rate decreases up to 0.5%.
Solar panel can only take in what light the sun brings.
By the 1950’s solar conversion rates reached 6%. This was considered a scientifically practical device but remained economically unviable to a consumer base. The cost-output discrepancy was hugely exaggerated in the 50’s but the same trade-off is still pointed to by today’s solar sceptics.
Today’s solar panels convert up to 22% of light into electricity and a single panel will costs £150 - £300.
In 1973 the University of Delaware physics department created Solar 1, the first house with fully solar powered utilities in what was a breakthrough for solar energy and became an attraction for visitors.
The breakthrough came only months before the West and the USA was faced with the 1973 oil crisis. Solar came to the front of political imaginations as quite possibly the alternative energy source that was needed. However, the sore in investment and interest dissipated once the crisis was over. Support for solar energy became tied to political loyalties.
Solar energy has been held back by bipartisanship in American politics. It has been caught in the crossfire between political factions loyal to the fossil fuel industry and those looking to greener energy. Their on-again off-again relationship with the Whitehouse roof clouded solar confidence and divided support among party lines. In the USA, support for industrial solar expansion is grown large (82%) but there remains a clear party split (93% Democrats, 70% of Republicans).